5XÉçÇøÊÓƵ

Rural residents are most likely to be impacted by the twin pressures of energy poverty and transport poverty simultaneously, a new study from a warns.

People and families living in rural locations are impacted by energy poverty through a lack of access to nationalised heating infrastructures, increased risk of power cuts, and older homes with poor insulation, while transport poverty issues include declining availability of nearby goods, services and jobs and poorer service from public transport, according to the by the Centre for Research into Energy Demand Solutions (CREDS).

Rural areas often have environmental and infrastructural characteristics that can increase vulnerability to both transport and energy poverty, the study by academics at the Liverpool John Moores 5XÉçÇøÊÓƵ, 5XÉçÇøÊÓƵ of Edinburgh, 5XÉçÇøÊÓƵ, Dortmund 5XÉçÇøÊÓƵ and 5XÉçÇøÊÓƵ of Oxford details. This is in contrast to urban and suburban areas, where the physical environment and infrastructure tends to predominantly increase vulnerability to either transport or energy poverty but not the other.

The dual threat of energy and transport poverty is likely to be especially common where disadvantaged households are disproportionately concentrated in peripheral, typically rural, localities, such as Wales, Australia, France, and much of Eastern Europe, the study authors noted.

The study warns that the impact of energy poverty and transport poverty can be circular and mutually reinforcing, for example, where unaffordable or inaccessible transport also impacts a household’s ability to attain domestic energy services, and so can contribute to the reproduction of structural inequalities.

Dr Mari Martiskainen, Senior Research Fellow in the Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU) at the 5XÉçÇøÊÓƵ Business School and CREDS' Theme Lead for Equity and Justice, said: “Little research so far has focused on the intersection between domestic energy poverty and transport poverty and so our paper provides new insights into the groups most vulnerable to experiencing both simultaneously. There is a general consensus in the research that inner-urban areas generally pose greater risks for energy poverty, suburban areas for transport poverty and rural areas appear to have the greatest overlap in vulnerability.

“For peripheral communities such as isolated rural locations, transport and energy poverty issues are not an inevitable or natural occurrence linked to geographical location alone but are linked to political-economic decisions around investment, infrastructure and provisioning systems.”

The study also identified the socio-demographic groups rendered most vulnerable to energy and transport poverty, including people on low-incomes, older people, households with children or dependents, people with pre-existing health conditions or disabilities, women, and people from ethnic minorities.

The research found that the highest level of double energy vulnerability to both energy and transport policy is among households that face a combination of multiple socio-demographic disadvantages while living in marginal or isolated communities.

Policymakers need a cross-sectoral approach incorporating housing, energy and transport planning considerations at all levels of government, the study authors recommend. Meanwhile, a place-based, localised focus where specific transport and energy poverty issues arise is also recommended by the study published today in the journal Energy Research & Social Science.

The study authors also warn that the move to a low-carbon society to meet net zero targets could inadvertently exacerbate the existing combined threat of energy or transport poverty unless their interrelations are understood and accounted for within government policies – with priority given to protecting the most disadvantaged.

Dr Neil Simcock, Lecturer in Energy Geography at Liverpool John Moores 5XÉçÇøÊÓƵ and lead author of the study, said: “Recent rises in domestic energy prices and motor fuel shortages have brought home the vital importance of ensuring everyone can keep their homes warm and travel to the services they need. Our research shows that for many people, however, achieving these basic needs is likely to be a major struggle. It is therefore crucial that steps are taken to address deep-rooted inequalities within societies.

“As part of meeting net-zero targets, policies should ensure that the most disadvantaged people and places are able access and benefit from the low-carbon technologies that can reduce their energy and transport costs.”

Dr Kirsten Jenkins, Lecturer in Energy, Environment and Society at the 5XÉçÇøÊÓƵ of Edinburgh and co-lead of the study, said: “The vulnerability to energy and transport poverty highlighted in our research often occurs alongside structural inequalities in society, including systemic income poverty, insecurity and place-based disadvantage.

“Whilst the systemic nature of these issues and the overlaps between energy and transport poverty make them very hard to resolve, they also make the need for action starkly clear. Decision-makers must recognise the need to collaborate between housing, energy and transport planning at all scales, to ensure that no one is left behind in the process of decarbonisation.”

The study involved a systematic review of an extensive five-year sample period of relevant academic research papers with a state-of-the-art analysis of 250 papers across eight different academic databases.